No Limit Hold ‘Em: Theory and Practice by David Sklansky and Ed Miller. I first read David Sklansky and Ed Miller’s No Limit Hold ‘Em: Theory and Practice over . No Limit Hold ’em has ratings and 16 reviews. David said: I’m going to have to come back to this and reread it (probably multiple times) to absorb al. Documents Similar To No Limit Hold ‘Em Theory and Practice (David Sklansky, Ed Miller). Small Stakes Holdem by Miller English. Uploaded by. Ralf Ehrhard.
|Published (Last):||13 January 2016|
|PDF File Size:||9.10 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.4 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Poker Book Review: NL Hold’em Theory and Practice by Sklansky and Miller
daivd But during the course of the evening you notice that this is not just a ‘call every bet’ player but rather a player snd recognizes your play and distinguishes it from the maniac on your right.
Most good players know that bluffing a calling station is not a positive EV move. And of course, even if you master the math, you can never crunch the numbers perfectly for any given situation, because too much is variable.
Most poker books pose the same challenge to readers: Amazon Inspire Digital Educational Resources.
No Limit Hold ’em: Theory and Practice Book – David Sklansky and Ed Miller
Henry rated it it was amazing Oct 24, Sklansky is an expert at his art. Robert davidd it it was amazing Shelves: Mar 09, Iskander rated it really liked it Shelves: With small stacks the reverse concept is usually true.
Tbeory title is a bit of a misnomer, as the book contains a lot more theory than practice. David attributes his standing in the gambling community to three facts: If she’s a frequent bluffer, she could easily have nothing now the majority of the time! Alexa Actionable Analytics for the Web. Beforeit could be difficult to find a game.
Theory and Practice is the definitive work on this complex game. When you contemplate a semi-bluff with a drawing hand, you have to compare the expectation of betting against the expectation of checking.
He has written many books on poker, blackjack, and general gambling. Online Casinos in Malaysia Find out how to qualify for this book in the Two Plus Two poker bonus program. Of course, over time, you will develop intuitions about situations, but books of more recent vintage that are based on this stuff are xnd waste of paper for the most part.
It doesn’t distinguish much between cash games and tournaments, other than a few observations about when you might change your strategy slightly for a tournament i. Patrick Dugan rated it liked it Nov 19, But the good part about this book is that the book makes a very explicit distinction in explaining the difference between limit and no limit; and between deep stack no limit and short stack no limit; and between cash game and tournament.
Though Sklansky and Miller emphasize this point repeatedly, they would have done well to introduce it early as a theoretical frame for the rest of their advice. I checked it out from the library, but I’m sure I’m going to acquire my own copy.
About the Author David Sklansky is generally considered the number one authority on gambling in the world today. Lots of discussion with examples about pot odds actual and impliedvalue betting, and ways to quantify risk and reward that allow for you to play a deeper, better, and more complete poker game.
This book got me thinking in a fundamentally different way about the game. Details Customers who bought this item also bought Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1 This shopping feature will continue to load items. Feb 28, Bryce Johnson rated it liked it.
Take, for instance, this concept of Multiple Level Thinking. I’ve read it like three times, and probably will wklansky soon. However, players at the same table will exhibit difference levels of play and you must adjust your play back at them based on a constantly changing assessment of their level of ability.
Most players learn by watching television or by listening to dubious advice from their friends.
The fact that she bet helps you narrow down her hand range considerably. Reviewed for Card Player. On the surface, I thought the Sklansky-Chubukov rankings alone were remarkably interesting, and perhaps worth the price of admission itself.